• A historical overview detailing the company's establishment in the 1970s under the Ministry of Commerce, its various restructurings, and its current governance under the Ministry of Finance. The corporate structure was illustrated in a detailed chart, showing all corporate vehicles used by the Ministry of Finance to hold shares in the SOE.

• An analysis of the company’s subsidiaries, partnerships, and primary clients. Notably, one subsidiary was in the process of liquidation, but this was voluntary, not court ordered.
• A history of all litigation involving the SOE in the past 10 years. This indicated that they all were course-of-business disputes, and did not involve significant sums, bribery or other criminal cases.
• Information regarding the former CEO who was under investigation for bribery. Public details were sparse, but the media coverage and the court filings implicated the individual alone, and not the company.
• We identified several instances of adverse media coverage regarding strikes at the SOE. Between 2020 - 2024, employees on minimal wages organized multiple strikes, which garnered significant attention from national and regional news outlets.
• Other checks against sanction lists and searches for other penalties or exclusions revealed no other notable adverse findings for the SOE.

• We discovered substantial real estate assets in the US, owned by the Competitor through its indirect US subsidiaries.
• We identified high-value assets including a corporate jet, luxury vehicles, and inventory, stored in the US, Europe or in transit.
• We located intellectual property across multiple jurisdictions, notably several valuable technological patents.
• We analyzed the Competitor's balance sheet, identifying all relevant cash, investments, and accounts receivable that could be leveraged by our client.

Our investigation also examined the Competitor's liabilities. We looked at other creditors, existing legal claims against the Competitor, and assets encumbered by these liabilities, all of which could influence our Client's ability to enforce the award.

We also examined whether the competitor was engaging in asset diversion tactics such as selling assets to related third parties at below-market prices, transferring assets to offshore entities, restructuring operations into less accessible subsidiaries, or artificially inflating liabilities. Our findings revealed no evidence of such activities.

• Custom software system, similar to our Alexandria product: Created an internal webapp that could be accessed globally. The app featured links to OSINT resources and databases, all documented and properly organized.
• API Integration: Integrated the system with four APIs for people search (1), Internet domain information (2), email address research (3), and phone number investigations(4), using external providers selected by the client.

• Development of Custom Tools: Created custom tools for adverse media and phone number investigations, based on the concept of our Adverse Media Search and Phone Variant Search tools.

• VPN and Research Accounts Setup: Assisted in setting up a VPN and various anonymous research accounts, to ensure maximum security and privacy when conducting online research.
• Password Manager Implementation: Established a shared password manager for the client's analysts, enabling them to securely and efficiently create, access, or modify research accounts on social media and other platforms.